Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane OCR: Even those courts which apply an extra-judicial source requirement recusal motions brought under 455a recognize that for the purposes their inherent authority to disqualify, it does not matter whether the appearance of bias arises iT prior judicial proceeding Jacobs, 855 F.2d 656 careful reading of Jacabs makes clear, this position inconsistent and indefensible Jacobs candidly admitted that if the facts faced had arisen UO motion for recusal pursuant 455(a) would not have required the district judge's disqualification because the appearance of bias aros the course of judicial procecding 855 F.2d 656 Because the issue arose or appeal prior remand how- ever the court used inherent authority assign the case different judge 656 The jacobs court's approach thus forbids a judge from even conside ...
(.png)
